|
by Alan Tonelson, Monday, February 22, 2010
Many observers of US trade flows took heart from the substantial reduction in the trade deficit that took place in 2009. The reason is pretty straightforward: We didn't import as much oil or as many goods and services since our economy was mired in recession. Plants weren't turning out goods and thus were not consuming energy. And millions of unemployed and discouraged workers were not driving to their old jobs. Consumers were saving for a change -- instead of spending their latest withdrawal of home equity on the latest Toyota (smart move). However, the fall in the deficit does not mean that our manufacturing base -- that great generator of jobs and wealth -- is somehow in better shape. It isn't. The great danger here is that the President and his men will decide they don't have to do anything about the 30-year hole that we've dug for ourselves with ill-advised trade policies. In fact, they appear to have decided that already. Where there is no vision the people perish.
Additional Opinion Articles
Tuesday, February 09, 2010
by Kevin L. Kearns and Alan Tonelson, Thursday, February 04, 2010
Thursday, February 04, 2010
Wednesday, February 03, 2010
Monday, February 01, 2010
Up to the Minute Commentary:
|
Obama Rewards Another Outsourcer
Here's why it's not a stretch to argue that naming Honeywell's chairman to the new national deficit commission is like naming Tiger Woods to a new national marriage promotion commission.
|
The Unjustified Whining About "Buy American"
The GAO and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce are complaining that the Obama stimulus package's Buy American requirements are doing the economy more harm than good. Too bad neither set of complaints passes the baloney test.
|
|